The first time a White interviewer has the 'stones or stonettes' to ask Michelle Obama a tough follow-up question, she will blow up, go nuclear, cry Racism, lash out, lose her cool, reveal her true self, spit bullets, go ballistic, go bonkers, go off the deep end, over the top, over the edge, scream, yell, raise the roof, spout hate, cuss like a sailor, curse the White Man, blame the Jews, kill the messenger, kick the dog and screw the pooch! 

 

P.s. OBlahBlah claims he’s half-White….which parts would those be?

Unbeknownst to Mayor Hickenlooper (d) and everyone else in attendance, African-American singer Rene Martin combined the words of the Black National Anthem and the melody of the National Anthem at the 2008 Denver state of the city address.  Unlike an NHL Hockey game, where both the Canadian and American National Anthems are sung back-to-back, when teams from both countries are represented, nobody present insisted that the traditional National Anthem be sung before the official proceedings began.

 

Is this but one example of a new-found Black militancy that we should expect to see, now that The Dalai Bhama has ascended to National prominence?  Will increasing vocal demands for Slavery reparations be next, because Michelle Obama was born angry?  Have the broadcast preachings of Reverend Jeremiah Wrightmare enflamed, an entire generation, of African-Americans to get up in the White Man’s face?

 

Far from “bringing people together”, Barama’s candidacy appears to be radicalizing the public comportment and personal behavior of Black Americans against their White brothers.  It seems that Black Pride, in Barry’s presumptive nomination, has quickly turned into expectations of Black Payback, echoes of Black Power and is eerily reminiscent of the Gay Pride movement, which transmogrified into Militant Homosexuality, near-naked public parades and demands for same-sex marriage.

 

When Joe Lieberman was on the democrat ticket in 2000 did American Jews demand a kosher chicken in every pot?  Did Southerners try to change America the Beautiful to Dixie when Carter and Clinton ran for National Office?  And did Northeastern Liberals insist that Chowder be added to the official FDA food pyramid, just because John Kerry took a few months off from the Senate?

 

The only thing more extreme, than Blacks pushing to remake America in their own image (if Oblah-blah gets elected), will be the wrath they’ll rain down on this Country when he’s defeated!

 

 

All those who thought that George W. Bush would become irrelevant, after the mid-term elections of 2006, need look no further than the third major war funding bill he just signed - to see the error of their ways.  Three times, the President out-maneuvered and out-foxed the “cut-and-run Liberals” for $95 million in May, 2007, $70 million last Christmas and now another $162 million.  $327,000,000 AFTER losing control of both houses of Congress and the confidence of a majority of American citizens!

Furthermore, Bush beat back every effort to impose the democrats’ defeatist deadlines for early withdrawal and other micro-managing of the Military, designed to affect failure.

Best of all – America is now winning the ‘Heart & Minds’ of both Sunnis and Shiites, routing al Qaeda into the caves of Tora Bora and beating-back Iranian influence in Iraq.  

Against all odds, ignoring the polls, standing up to critics, detractors, political opponents, the Media and the enemies of Freedom and Democracy, George W. Bush has shown true leadership. 

President Won – Opponents None: Scoreboard!  

 

 

When the Rockies vs. Royals game ended early, I happened upon C-SPAN’s broadcast of the House Sub-Committee on Energy & Commerce where various expert panels were providing testimony regarding speculation in the Oil Futures Market.  Generally, this stuff is pretty dry, but given the recent political hyperbole and aspersions being cast about, I spent the next four hours watching. 

I was surprised to learn that most of the speculation in this market was actually being conducted by Public Pension Funds; Labor Unions, Teachers Unions, Public Employee Unions all desperately looking for windfall profits to subsidize their onerous fiscal obligations to retirees.  How ironic, the very special interest groups who contribute exclusively to elect democrats, now are revealed to be the ones who are profiting on the backs of the working poor, small businesspeople and consumers (women and children hit hardest) through questionable speculative trading.  

Congressman Jay Inslee (d –WA) asked representatives of the Trucking and Airline Industries why they now needed Congress to solve (their) problem (high fuel costs) with new government regulation of the Futures Market?  The answer is that Congressional Democrats have caused this problem by restricting the Oil Company’s exploration for more supply, through regulation.

When it comes to the high cost of oil & gas, democrats are squeezing both the supply and the price.  Meanwhile, they’re blaming Big Oil, Enron-like speculators and, of course, President Bush.   

Otterbama: Ladies and gentlemen, I'll be brief. The issue here is not whether I broke my promise to abide by campaign spending limits or took a few liberties with the truth, about my close association with George Soros and MoveOn.Org -- I did. But you can't hold my campaign responsible for the behavior of a few angry, Blame-America-First, individual Leftists.  For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole democrat party? And if the whole democrat party is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our political institutions in general? I put it to you, Mr. McCain... isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can say what you want about me, but I’m not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America!

In his most Current Screed published in the Rocky Mountain News, former musical entertainer turned partisan hate-monger, Garrison Keillor gushes ad nauseum his growing arousal for that “skinny young black guy” – Barack Obama (There’s a lot to catch your eye in Obama, 6/14/08).  Keillor concludes by saying, “that when Obama launches forth [against his political foes], he is throwing nothing but strikes.”

 

Strike One!  Obama kicks Pastor Wrightmare and his entire religious community of 20 years to the curb.

 

Strike Two!  Obama tosses out his just convicted political patron - Tony Rezko, his long-time political supporters, convicted Felons – Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn along with numerous anti-Semitic and anti-Israel foreign policy advisors.

 

Strike Three!  Obama forces out VP Search Committee Chairman, Jim Johnson who got $7,000,000 of special ‘Ear Marked’ loans.

 

For once I agree with Keillor, Obama has thrown strikes – but the only ones making it over the plate are ‘friendly-fire’ shots killing-off his own people and his own past.  The question is, by the time Election Day rolls around will ANYONE from Obama’s past still

be left on his team or will they have all struck out?

 

Recently, a small news item buried in my local paper reported that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Iraq and was quoted as saying that she, “welcomed that country’s progress in passing a budget as well as oil legislation and a bill paving the way for the provincial elections in the Fall that are expected to more equitably redistribute power among local officials.”  Only three months earlier she told CNN, “The purpose of the surge was to create a secure time for the government of Iraq to make the political change to bring reconciliation to Iraq, they have not done that. The gains have not produced the desired effect, which is the reconciliation of Iraq. This is a failure. This is a failure.”
A year before the democrats’ “no political progress” argument was disproved, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) proclaimed, “Now I believe myself . . . that this war is lost, and that the surge is not accomplishing anything.”  By Dec. ’07, Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), one the top war critics, stunned fellow democrats with his statement that "the surge is working."  Murtha's view was backed by Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), who also said the surge worked after he returned from Iraq.
Before President Bush ordered the Surge, democrats uniformly proclaimed that Iraq had descended into civil war, yet Sunnis rejoined and Muqtada Al-Sadr’s Shiites have remained in the Government and Al Qaeda in Iraq had all but been defeated.  When it became apparent that the Al Qaeda and Iranian-inspired and supported civil war didn’t succeed, democrats tried to diminish the stature of Iraq’s leadership by claiming that (it) would not commit the Army against Sadr’s militia.  After Sadr’s thugs were routed in Basra by the predominantly Shiite Iraqi Army, democrats have now moved the ‘goal posts of progress’ once again.
Today, the standard democrat line is that Iran has been strengthened because America took out Saddam.  In the defeatist world of liberals, Iran developing nuclear weapons and fomenting revolution in Iraq is our fault, if only we’d left Saddam in power he’d have checked Iran’s desire to inflict fundamental Islam throughout the Middle East and destroy Israel.  Iran held Americans for 444 days during the Carter Administration, has funded and supplied weapons to Hamas and Hezbollah for decades and began developing nuclear weapons and rocket delivery technology many years before the U.S. removed Iraq’s dictator.
Every democrat argument against the Bush policy in Iraq has turned out to be a ‘red herring’.  Every time the facts-on-the-ground prove them wrong, they simply move ‘the goal posts of accomplishment’.  The truth is, that democrats don’t want to recognize any progress in Iraq, don’t want to get serious about containing Islamic Fundamentalism out of Iran and they don’t really care about the American troops or Iraqi civilians killed or wounded, except to exploit them for political purposes.    

 

After three days of glowing 'All Obama, All The Time' coverage by the Rocky Mountain News (RMN), I wasn't the least bit surprised that the Rocky didn't report a single word about the conviction of Tony Rezko.   Found guilty on 16 counts of Fraud and Influence Peddling, this Southside Chicago developer and political operative, was instrumental in the financing of Barack Obama's rise to power.  Additionally, Rezko made a sweetheart land deal with Obama to help him purchase his modest $1.8 million home. 
Today's NYTimes quoted Obama saying, “This isn’t the Tony Rezko I knew.”   Obama said much the same things about Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Father Pfleger after they demeaned White People and damned America.  On his way to the democrat nomination, Obama has also thrown his old friends and convicted 60's bomb-throwers, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, under the proverbial bus while demanding that the Media give his wife a 'free pass' whenever she opens her mouth and blames-American-first.  By the time democrats invade Denver this Summer, will there be ANY former friends, family or supporters of Obama left standing?
Maybe the RMN will be inclined to report on Rezko's sentencing in September, provided that he doesn't plead out before then and implicate Obama directly in more unsavory political conduct.

Well, I think we finally figured out what the “Change” is that Obama promises; he’s changing pastors, changing churches, changing friends and changing his tune.  Everyday brings another “change” for the Dalai Bhama.  He’ll immediately negotiate with America’s sworn enemies, without preconditions – oops, scratch that, now he’s gonna do a little planning and wait a year or so –  is that the “change” he’s talking about?  He’s gonna “change” the tone in Washington, except when it comes to talking about Bush, Cheney, Halliburton, Conservatives and anything else Republican. 

Obama has 86-ed his spiritual advisor, his new pastor, his congregation, a couple-three anti-Israeli political advisors, Tony Rezco, Bill Ayers, his White racist grandmother and anyone not eating arugula, living on a college campus or in ‘da hood’. 

The real question is – which of his old friends and supporters has he not had to disavow and when did his wife stop beating him?

 

P.s. Obama bowls like a girl and when he plays basketball – he’s a selfish ball-hog!  

 

P.s.s. Now he’s free to join a new mosque, but he’ll have to lose that Men In Black suit thing and bring back that Somali turban thingy!

I’m 55 years old and until last month, I’d never had a racist thought pass between my ears or over my lips.  But now, after a few weeks of Rev. Jeremiah Wright hating on the White Man, Barack Obama's shuck ‘in and jiv’in under the TV spotlights and Black journalists, ministers and campaign supporters defending the indefensible – I’m fast becoming a real US-American racist!

When the Primary Season began, Race was not a campaign issue.  Obama didn’t want to be known as the ‘Black Candidate’, none of the Republican nominees wanted to make race an issue and, even when Oprah endorsed Obama, the issue was her dissing the first woman to run for president rather than promoting a man simply because he was black.

What offends me the most is the smug elitism that both Barack and Rev. Wright exude.  It’s this air of superiority about Black Liberation Theology, that is even more offensive than their ‘blame America first’ and Hamas = victims, Israel = terrorists drivel, that is turning me against my fellow African Americans.

Now Rev. Wright says; that when E.F. Farrakhan speaks all blacks listen, that Minister Farrakhan didn’t call Judaism a “gutter religion” rather that Zionism was in the gutter (only trouble is that Zionism is not a religion) and that Obama’s just another politician and come Nov. 5^th he’ll still be a pastor (I thought Obama said Wright had retired and that if he hadn’t, Obama would’ve left the church).

Obama claims he’s the one to unite all Americans, but he can’t even get his angry Black “uncle” to halt his hating.  Obama claims he possesses superior judgment to that of the Commander In Chief, the majority of Congress and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but he didn’t have the good sense to 86 Jeremiah, William Ayers or Tony Rezko.  He’s content to cede Iraq to Al Qaeda, to put Israel in the sites of a nuclear Iran and to invalidate free trade agreements throughout the Americas.

When John McCain defeats Obama in November, I’m worried that the Rev. Wrights of the world will blame his loss on racism and do everything they can to set back race relations 50 years.  If the DNC super delegates select Hillary in Denver, these Race Hustlers will set of race riots in every major city in America and if Hillary Clinton should be elected president don’t expect ‘America’s first Black President’ Bill Clinton to bridge the racial divide that Obama’s candidacy has resurrected.

At least Obama’s Return to Racism candidacy has knocked Michael Vick, O.J. Simpson and illegal immigration off the front pages, so maybe, as the Barack & Michele show fades from the national spotlight, my newfound racism will fade away as well.................I hope so.

Despite his recent statements in support of Israel, I fear that, when push comes to shove, Barack Obama will ‘turn a blind eye’ toward the fate of the Jewish State.  Obama will allow America’s historical ally to ‘twist in the wind’ not because his middle name is Hussein, not because his Illinois church published  anti-Semitic rants by Nation of Islam founder Louis Farrakhan and not because he told 60 Minutes that, as President  he would negotiate unconditionally with Syria and Iran.  Barack Obama will acquiesce into abandoning Israel, because Iran and Syria will demand he do so, in exchange for Ahmadinejad and Assad agreeing to stay out of Iraq, in the aftermath of Obama’s immediate and unilateral withdrawal from Mesopotamia.

Regardless of what else might ‘change’ during his administration, Obama will be considered a total disaster if after his precipitous departure from Iraq; Iran, Syria and Al Qaeda overrun that country, execute all who fought for their freedom and turn that oil rich land into a launching pad for Islamic Fundamentalism and international terrorism.

In order to satisfy his ‘cut & run’ supporters but not ‘snatch defeat from the jaws of victory’, I’m afraid Obama would cut such a deal with Israel’s sworn enemies.  He’s already on record supporting the relaxation of restrictions on direct aid to the Palestinians, despite their election of Hamas, and has said that, "nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people".  Obama voted against a Senate resolution urging the Bush administration to label the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization.  He opposed that measure because he feared it might give the President the authority to use military action against a nuclear Iran.  Does anyone really think that an Obama Administration would actually stop Iran’s 25 year march toward securing nuclear weapons?   

After fleeing Iraq, Obama’s other great international priority is “making America respected around the world again”.  Considering the dozens and dozens of anti-Israel resolutions passed by the United Nations, Barack could find a lot of friends among the despots and dictators of the world by simply ignoring Israel.  Obama mistakes ‘respect’ for ‘appeasement’ in a headlong rush to his ‘can‘t we all just get along’ world.  Despite his lack of experience and Pollyannaish naiveté, America might survive Obama’s kumbaya presidency, but it could come at the expense of Israel’s existence.  

In his 12/30/07 Denver Post editorial, Still in harm’s way, U.S. Rep. Mark Udall (D) hopes “we will begin the process of turning over to the Iraqi people the political and military responsibility for their country”.  The truth is that political control was handed over on June 28, 2004, by the Coalition Provision Authority’s Paul Bremer to Iyad Allawi, Iraq’s first prime minister.  Subsequently, over eight million Iraqis voted in national elections, an Iraqi constitution was ratified and local provincial councils began governing as well.  As of Sept. 10, 2007, when Gen. David Patreaus testified before Congress, over 140 battalions of Iraqi Army and police were capable of leading military operations and new recruits were coming forward in record numbers.  Additionally, British troops handed over control of Basra to the Iraqi Army, in February of 2007 and reported levels of violence have dropped precipiticly.  Clearly, Iraqis began taking political and military responsibility for their country a long time ago and Rep. Udall should be well aware of these facts.

Along with other Colorado Democrat politicians; Cong. Ed Perlmutter and Gov. Bill

Ritter, Mark Udall now acknowledges the success of the ‘surge’ ordered by President Bush.  Udall qualifies his support by claiming that our defeating Al Qaeda in Iraq has “deepened Iraqi dependence on U.S. Troops”.  Despite evidence to the contrary, Rep. Udall makes this sensational accusation without presenting any supporting documentation or testimony.

Additionally, Udall bemoans that “our army is not large enough to sustain current troop levels in Iraq” and that “the security situation in Afghanistan has gotten worse”, but he neglects to advocate increasing the size of our active military or to mention the significant role and responsibility of NATO forces in combating the Taliban.

Udall writes “the greatest gift Congress can give our soldiers next year is sure knowledge that a grateful nation will soon welcome them home.”  Congressman Udall, how about Congress giving; our soldiers the funding needed to win, and the Iraqis the support and patience to resolve their historical differences? 

 

 

I agree with the Jewish Defense League (JDL) that Will Smith’s comments were insulting to Holocaust survivors and Jews in general and for the following reasons, he should be made an example of. 

By claiming that Hitler was a “good person”, Smith advances an agenda of ‘moral equivalency’ that will ultimately end in the abandonment and destruction of the State of Israel.  In the aftermath of World War II it would have been unthinkable to call Hitler anything but “pure evil” (if one ventured to speak his name at all).  In earlier generations it would have been politically incorrect to deny the existence of Hitler’s genocide.  Today, liberals regularly label President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft and anyone else they hate, “Hitler” and good liberals don’t even raise an eyebrow.

Similarly, after Israel’s War of Independence in 1948, it would have been unthinkable to call Israel’s Arab neighbors anything but ‘aggressors’.  In earlier generations it would have been politically incorrect to deny that Israel was founded as a Jewish State.  Today, Hamas and Hezbollah homicide bombers are said to have the same moral authority as the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and the Holocaust Denier-and Chief in Iran again threatens destruction of Jews and Israel.

Does Will Smith really think that when Hitler advocated and approved children being murdered in front of their mothers, wives being raped in front of their husbands and using humans for medical experimentation, he was just trying to do something good for Das Fatherland?  Does Smith think that if we had just tried to understand Hitler and talk with him, we could’ve “reprogrammed” him to be a better person?  Had Will Smith been alive during World War II, chances are that he would have been tortured, mutilated and incinerated, along with six million Jews and two million other ‘mongrel’ races, by Adolph the Good. 

Had Smith, who is neither Jewish nor German but is Black, used Mugabbee, Edi Amin Dada or Michael Vick as his example, at least he’d be talking about someone he has some possible connection to and understanding of.  The fact that Smith felt free to use Hitler as an example of his “there’s good in everybody” drivel, illustrates just how little today’s liberals care about offending Jewish sensitivities. 

Barak Obama’s expressed willingness to talk, to the Hitler of our day - Iran’s Ahmadinejad, is but another extension of the moral equivalency found in Smith’s remarks.  Smith has publicly endorsed Barak Obama and ultimately, (G-d forbid) President Obama will appease Islamic Extremists by abandoning America’s historical alliance and support for Israel.  After all, we can achieve all the energy-independence we want, but as long as we’ve got Israel’s back, Ahmadinejad, Assad and Osama will keep coming after us.  The Left’s over-riding effort ‘to just (all) get along’ will lead Smith and his candidate, Obama to throw Israel overboard.

The JDL, whose motto is “Never Again”, wants arrest and reverse the subtle Anti-Semitism Will Smith has now advanced and by calling on (his) candidate, to repudiate such a statement, they hope to force Obama to stop blurring the line between good and evil and between our allies and our enemies.   

 

 

 

In reviewing the Rocky Mountain News 48 choices for top 10 stories of the year (It's the readers' turn - 12/22/07), the only one presented with a qualifying "but" was * U.S. troop surge in Iraq takes effect: violence drops but does not halt.  Where was the * Nancy Pelosi elected first female speaker of the house, BUT accomplishes almost nothing?  How about * President, Democrat-led Congress at odds over health coverage, Iraq, spending, BUT Bush prevails?  How come I couldn't find * Alberto Gonzales quits as attorney general after string of controversies, BUT allegations of wrong-doing go unsubstantiated and unproven?  Did I miss * Iran spars with international community over its nuclear program, BUT continues to hide its facilities and threaten Israel's existence?  What happened to  * Political crisis in Pakistan: Musharraf declares state of emergency, BUT cancels it six weeks later and honors pledge to resigns army post?  Where did * Afghan war:deadliest year since 2001, BUT NATO/government forces prevail in every battle with Taliban go?  Where was * Palestinians feud among themselves heading toward peace talks with Israel, BUT continue to fire rockets at Jewish settlements and hold kidnapped soldiers?   What about *Oil prices soar worldwide, BUT average cost/gal. of unleaded gas same as 2004 - 2005 and below 2006?  How about *Attempt to forge compromise on illegal immigration collapses in Congress, BUT political consensus to secure borders first strengthens?  These are my top 10 the way they should have been presented, BUT without doubt, the defeat of Al-Qaeda in Iraq by American/Iraqi troops was the best story of 2007.

 

A sure sign that the U.S. Military is succeeding in Iraq is when a democrat congressman tells you so (Perlmutter sees some hope in Iraq, RockyMountainNews 12/8/07).  After two years of campaigning against success in Iraq, advocating retreat and defeat and voting against military appropriations, there’s a hearty meal of humble pie waiting for Colorado's Ed Perlmutter, after his recent visit to Iraq.  While Perlmutter said he saw” absolute optimism, hope, spirit and spunk in the eyes of some Iraqi kids” in Jordanian refugee camps, he failed to mention the 30,000 Iraqi refugees who returned to Baghdad just last month.  While he “talked with our men and women up there”, Perlmutter couldn’t bring himself to even utter the words ‘military, soldiers or U.S. troops’ anywhere in his interview and while crediting Gen. Patreaus and the “surge”, he neglected to credit our Commander In Chief who stood strong despite the wave of national pessimism which characterized the election of 2006.
In his interview, Perlmutter twice suggested that America should assure Iraqis that “our troops will not be there forever”, rather, we should honor our commitment, and not cut-and-runa (as was the case after the 1rst Gulf War), until they have the security and political situation under control.
Congressman Perlmutter didn’t have to travel 8,000 miles to Ramadi to learn about such progress, but now even he can’t, and doesn’t deny it.  Ed Perlmutter now needs to admit he was wrong about Iraq.  He needs to apologize for bad-mouthing President Bush and stop trying to hamstring our military, by linking premature withdrawal deadlines to military budgets.
Now that's the kind of political reconcilliation/progress I'd like to see.